Showing posts with label daniel radcliffe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label daniel radcliffe. Show all posts

Friday, April 25, 2014

A Transatlantic Transfer Worth Making the Journey

Review: The Cripple of Inishmaan

We're not in Hogwarts anymore.

Things are not what they seem in the solidly staged and superbly acted Broadway revival of Martin McDonagh's The Cripple of Inishmaan.  For one thing, despite a marketing campaign consisting entirely of photos of leading man Daniel Radcliffe, the former Harry Potter is absent for large swaths of the evening.  There are also a LOT of secrets being kept by the residents of Inishmaan, and while the constant string of revelations gives the show its fast pace and crackling energy, it can be difficult to keep track of which version of events is the current "truth."  Yet despite occasionally feeling like a bait and switch, The Cripple of Inishmaan is a handsomely staged dark comedy that seems especially fresh and modern in a Broadway season filled with classic dramas.

The play takes place in 1934 on the rocky isle of Inishmaan, just off the coast of Ireland.  There isn't a whole lot to do on Inishmaan, and the place is kind of a dump (one of the play's many running gags is how implicitly awful the island is, since the arrival of cripples, sharks, and Englishmen are all considered signs of the town's up and coming status).  When he learns the neighboring island of Inishmore is playing host to a documentary film crew all the way from Hollywood, "Cripple" Billy Claven sees his chance to escape his humdrum life and finally see some of the world beyond Inishmaan's shores.

Radcliffe throws himself into the role of Billy with the kind of dedication rarely seen from young Hollywood stars on Broadway.  He exaggerates his physicality to the point of grotesqueness, which provides an interesting contrast to his boyish good looks and natural charisma.  Radcliffe's innate likability makes him easy to root for, and you certainly feel for him when the other characters casually and constantly insult him (no one has a problem calling him "Cripple Billy" to his face, and seem positively perplexed when it's suggested he might not be okay with the nickname).  Radcliffe's Billy wears his geniality as a mask, and the young actor expertly allows us to glimpse underneath that smiling exterior to see the damaged, lonely individual underneath.  It's a winsome performance, and it's a shame the play doesn't allow us to see more of it.

The rest of the ensemble, all reprising their performances from the 2013 West End mounting on which this production is based, are equally well suited to their roles.  As Billy's adoptive aunts, Ingrid Craigie and Gillian Hanna have an excellent comedic chemistry that makes their scenes of commiseration a hoot.  Pat Shortt's boisterous, obnoxious blowhard Johnnypateen always brings with him a delightfully madcap energy, delivering his often ludicrous dialogue with absolute sincerity.  And Sarah Greene's wilful tomboy Helen makes for an interesting foil to Radcliffe's Billy, although she doesn't ever allow the audience to warm to her quite the way Billy does.  All of the actors find the musicality in McDonagh's harsh, profanity-laden dialogue, and the interplay between the performers keeps the evening moving at a brisk pace throughout.

Director Michael Grandage (last represented on Broadway by the underwhelming Evita revival) stages the piece with a keen eye and a steady hand, allowing the play to do the heavy lifting rather than trying to impose some kind of high-minded directorial concept.  Grandage mostly succeeds at nailing the play's mix of tones, although it feels as if the script was intended to have more bite than it currently does (which may simply be a function of the play being almost 20 years old).  The revolving set designed by Christopher Oram is impressive without being distracting, and there is a beauty to his worn and tattered costumes that makes the play's world feel lived in. 

Overall, The Cripple of Inishmaan is a welcomed addition to the Broadway season, once which reconfirms both McDonagh's prowess as a playwright and Radcliffe's status as a fine actor remarkably unconcerned with personal vanity.  This production is expertly executed from top to bottom, and although the intervening years since its original premiere may have robbed the work of some of its edge, it remains an entertaining, stimulating coming of age tale peppered with a few unexpected twists.  There are far worse ways one could spend a night in the theatre, and if a truly breakout stage performance from Radcliffe remains elusive this is certainly another strong credit on his ever-growing resume.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Best of 2011 Countdown: #5

Yesterday I was naughty, now it’s time to go back to being nice.  Going forward I’ll be alternating between the Best and Worst lists, so that my number one choice for each will appear right before the New Year. :-)

 Best Shows of 2011
#5 How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying

Daniel Radcliffe in How to Succeed...


Confession time: I have a major soft spot for How to Succeed as a show.  Ever since playing Bud Frump in college, I’ve had an immense appreciation for this expertly crafted, Pulitzer Prize-winning musical.  The story is so tightly structured that even at 3 hours, there’s very little fat on the show.  There is an excellent assortment of characters that all receive the perfect amount of stage time, and the score is ingenious in the way it complements the show’s tone while remaining melodic and inventive.  And the witty satire of 1960s corporate culture is spot on, yet cannily hidden beneath a layer of fun that makes the show supremely accessible and entertaining to everyone.  Add to this my crush on Daniel Radcliffe and I was predisposed to love this show.

However, How to Succeed shares a lot of similarities with Promises, Promises, including director Rob Marshall, who absolutely butchered the latter show back in 2010.  And these star-driven revivals can be very hit or miss (especially with Radcliffe being a complete unknown in the song and dance department), so I approached the show with a mixture of excitement and dread.  And I left 3 hours later grinning from ear to ear.

This is the show many recent revivals were trying to be.  It highlights all of the best aspects of traditional musical theatre while updating things just enough to appeal to a contemporary audience.  No unwieldy concepts or gritty real world approach or scaled-down production values here; just good old fashioned musical comedy, executed by a uniformly excellent cast.  In the lead role Radcliffe is surprisingly good, his natural charm going a long way to make up for any vocal shortcomings (which are minimal for the demands of the show).  His dancing is genuinely shocking in its quality, and it’s refreshing to see a big name star actually get down and dirty with the ensemble rather than have everyone dance around them while they remain stationary.  You can tell Radcliffe is giving 110% and pushing himself to improve, and it just makes his performance that much more impressive.

The show has many great numbers, including two genuine showstoppers.  “Brotherhood of Man” is every bit as good as you could hope, and Rob Marshall must have been particularly inspired the day he came up with his staging for “Grand Old Ivy” (one of the few major changes for this revival, and one of best additions to a preexisting show I’ve seen in years).  And the choreography – another area where I’ve taken issue with Marshall in the past – is fantastic.

Anything Goes ended up with all the critical love last spring, but I honestly feel like How to Succeed is the better show.  I actively want to see it again, whereas once was enough for Anything Goes (although I do love me some Sutton Foster).  Most importantly, this production makes a 50-year-old show feel brand new, as if it had never been done before.  That is the goal of all revivals, and in achieving it How to Succeed earns its place among the year’s best shows.