As 2012 fades into 2013, Jared, Brian, and Christopher look back at the past six months on Broadway and the many productions of the fall season. Which shows impressed the most, and which ones missed the mark? Find out as we discuss our favorites and which shows we fully expect to see among next year's Tony nominees.
One opinionated New Yorker's thoughts on the good, the bad, and everything in between on the New York theatre scene.
Showing posts with label bring it on. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bring it on. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sometimes, Pretty Is Enough
Review: Bring
It On: The Musical
![]() |
| Adrienne Warren and the cast of Bring It On serve up major musical theatre realness. And they're pretty good athletes, too. |
Needless to say, Bring
It On: The Musical is not high art.
Anyone with such lofty expectations for the show has a gross
misunderstanding of the source material on which it is based. What this stage adaptation of the film series
of the same name does offer is plenty of fun and high-flying acrobatics, even
if some questionable story and tonal choices keep it from becoming the great piece
of fluff theatre it could be.
Set in the world of competitive cheerleading, Bring It On doesn’t precisely follow the
plot of the original movie or any of its sequels, instead using the franchise’s
general premise and themes as inspiration for an original story. The show begins with perky blonde Campbell
being elected captain of the Truman High School cheerleading squad, but her
dreams of winning the National Cheering Trophy are dashed when some
questionable school redistricting results in her forced transfer to the scary
multi-ethnic Jackson High. Not only is
Campbell a fish out of water, but the closest thing to a cheerleading squad at
Jackson is a dance crew led by sassy queen bee Danielle. This is obviously the Worst Thing Ever, and
poor Campbell must somehow find a way to convince Danielle to form a
cheerleading squad so that they both can compete at Nationals and win that
coveted trophy.
Obviously, this campy setup is meant to provide more jokes
than drama, a fact the show knows but doesn’t fully embrace. The biggest problem is that Bring It On doesn’t take the
outrageousness far enough, opting to play a large portion of the show
completely straight despite a steady stream of one-liners provided by book
writer Jeff Whitty (a Tony-winner for his work on Avenue Q). As a result, the
predictable plot drags at the start, although the approach does lead to some surprisingly
heartfelt scenes as the characters struggle with growing up. The second act ballad “Enjoy the Trip” is an
especially poignant and insightful commentary on the ultimate importance of
high school drama, and a highlight of the show.
Like most musical comedies, the real interest lies in the production
numbers, which are plentiful and generally well done. The contemporary score, co-written by Tom
Kitt (Next to Normal) and Lin-Manuel
Miranda (In the Heights), highlights
the very distinctive styles of its two composers while still sounding like a
cohesive whole. The R&B stylings
that characterize Miranda’s work are particularly prominent and enticing, and the
Bring It On score ends up being one
of the most fully realized blendings of showtunes and modern pop to ever grace
a Broadway stage. Mirroring this mix is
the excellent choreography by Andy Blankenbuehler (who also directed), which
makes hip hop dance wholly theatrical and is a refreshingly new addition to an
art form that can be painfully slow to evolve.
And when the fresh-faced cast breaks into the cheer routines
that form the centerpiece of Bring It On,
prepare to be amazed. The dizzying combination
of backflips, tumbling, and aerial acrobatics will take even the most jaded
theatre-goer’s breathe away, and these athletic feats are performed with a precision
and sleekness any show would do well to emulate. It is honestly a shame there aren’t more of
them – setting the first act primarily in a cheerleader-less school makes the
routines hard to sneak in – although the upside of this decision is that it
makes the dueling routines of the musical’s climax even more exciting.
The vast majority of the cast is making their Broadway
debuts, and what the performers lack in experience they make up for with
enthusiasm and general charisma. Taylor
Louderman’s Campbell can be a little bland, but she is believable, earnest, and
a generally likeable leading lady (Louderman also does an excellent job with
the enormous amount of singing she’s been handed). Adrienne Warren belts to the rafters as Danielle,
and her well-executed transformation from antagonistic to grudgingly respectful
to genuinely friendly is one of the more dramatic character arcs in the
show. The supporting players all manage
to make a positive impression, although the sheer number of characters leaves a
lot of the actors with precious little to do.
The real standout among the cast is Gregory Haney’s camp-tastic
turn as a drag queen student called La Cienega.
One of the few actors with prior Broadway experience, Haney takes a
character we know nothing about (only one line in the show even acknowledges
that her attending school in drag might have made her life difficult) and makes
her into the most compelling person on the stage. Completely over the top and reveling in every
minute of it, Haney represents the type of show Bring It On is *this close* to being: a high-camp delight that is
simultaneously hilarious and oddly engaging.
As stated above, Bring
It On isn’t high art. It has some
fairly glaring oversights, like a story that meanders for much of the first act
until settling into the predictable but effective drama of a sporting
competition. Everything seems to be just
a little too easy for Campbell, which makes it difficult to fully invest in the
plot or her hardships. And for a show
that traffics in cheerleader stereotypes, there is a surprising lack of
unrepentantly bitchy girls to serve as effective antagonists. The absence of a truly memorable villain,
someone the audience could love to hate, keeps Bring It On from entering the realm of top-tier escapist
entertainment, and we the audience must settle for merely very good rather than
great. That said, there are certainly
worse ways to spend a summer night than with this slickly polished musical
confection, and I for one am glad this national tour decided to stop by and
play in the big leagues.
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
A New Broadway Business Model? Bring It On!
This week we were treated to the first new musical of the
2012-2013 season when Bring It On officially
opened on Broadway. While I am
personally excited for the show, which I think sounds like a blast, I can also
understand those who are wary of a musical based on a movie of dubious quality
that has no less than four writers. But
aside from being a new show, I think Bring
It On represents a new way of developing musicals that while not perfect
for every show, could end up being a major boon to the future prospects of
certain theatrical properties.
We’re told Bring It On
was never intended for Broadway, and while I find that claim suspect (when
Tony-winning composers Tom Kitt and Lin-Manuel Miranda are collaborating, any
sane producer must at least *consider* Broadway), the fact of the matter is the
producers chose to skip the Great White Way in favor of a national tour. In doing so, they removed a lot of critical
pressure from the show, as Broadway-bound musicals are evaluated on an entirely
different and much more stringent metric.
These raised standards almost inevitably lead to lukewarm out-of-town reviews,
and if the press is overly negative it can lead to the cancelling of the
proposed Broadway run.
Shows that cancel already announced Broadway runs inevitably
get branded as failures, a major marketing hurdle any future productions or
revisions must overcome. By only
announcing a tour, the producers of Bring
It On managed to keep media scrutiny to a minimum and in essence gave
themselves permission to fail. A tour is
much less susceptible to negative reviews, because by the time bad word of
mouth starts to spread it has already moved on to the next destination, one in
which a good deal of seats are already sold to the touring house’s season
subscribers. The producers and the production
also don’t have to endure the embarrassment of canceling already announced
Broadway plans, keeping any potential downsides at a manageable level.
BUT, since the tour received enough positive response to
prompt a Broadway run, suddenly Bring It
On is positioned to be a pleasant surprise.
In addition to having avoided the massive expectations attached to “Broadway-bound”
shows, Bring It On is also arriving in
the midst of the summer doldrums, making it the only new game in town for New
Yorkers who have seen everything else.
Add to that audience the enormous number of tourists that are currently
increasing the box office of every show in town, and you have a musical that is
poised to do relatively strong business.
The show’s limited engagement should also help increase ticket sales, as
it forces anyone interested in seeing the show to buy their tickets sooner
rather than later.
Of course, New York’s famously jaded theatrical press could
spoil everything by trashing the show, but I think truly terrible reviews are
unlikely. For one thing, the show has
essentially been running for months, meaning that if nothing else it should be
the tightest, most polished version of Bring
It On possible. The competitive
cheerleading setting also necessitates musical staging unlike anything
currently on Broadway, and novelty usually earns at least measured praise from
the press.
If Bring It On can
manage decent reviews and good word of mouth from audiences, I see no reason
why its limited run can’t be extended, making the show more money and
increasing the perception of the show as a Little Musical That Could. The mere fact that the show had a Broadway
production brings with it a certain amount of legitimacy that will help catch
the eye of regional theatres and other touring houses, which in turn helps
widen the show’s exposure. And perhaps
most importantly, the longer Bring It On
runs, the better its chances at some Tony nominations, which would be a huge
boon to its future prospects on the road and as a licensable property.
Am I saying Bring It
On will win the 2013 Best Musical Tony?
Of course not. It’s far too early
in the season to be making those kinds of predictions. But I am saying that by starting with a tour
and then coming to Broadway during the less crowded summer months, Bring It On has maximized its chances of
making money and being generally well-received.
This developmental path would not work for every new musical (for
instance, the big name stars producers love to build a show around rarely go
out on tour), and I expect most shows will stick to the traditional out-of-town
or Off-Broadway routes. But if Bring It On is a success, it gives
producers another option on how to develop new work that helps maximize their
chances at financial success. And the more
money any musical makes, even a bad one, the more money producers have to
develop new works and continue to employ the next generation of theatrical
artists.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

